ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Animals that eat the carcasses of different animals can appear sort of gross. However a latest research reveals that scavengers, equivalent to vultures or hyenas, can truly be good for human well being. Sadly that very same research reveals that scavenger populations are declining. NPR’s Jonathan Lambert stories that would imply extra illness for people.

JONATHAN LAMBERT, BYLINE: Rising up in India, environmental economist Anant Sudarshan remembers the vultures.

ANANT SUDARSHAN: Once I used to go to highschool, we had been crossing this river, and also you all the time noticed these vultures in huge portions, partly as a result of they’d feed on carcasses alongside the aspect of the river.

LAMBERT: However within the mid-Nineteen Nineties, the vultures almost vanished, declining by over 95%. The offender? A painkiller given to livestock that simply occurred to be poisonous to vultures. Hundreds of thousands fewer vultures meant much more carcasses. Sudarshan, now on the College of Warwick, printed a research final yr discovering that had lethal implications for people.

SUDARSHAN: We discover kind of massive results on mortality of the order of kind of 100,000 further deaths a yr and, crucially, results which are sustaining a few years after the vulture disappears.

LAMBERT: Animal carcasses are hotbeds of micro organism that may trigger human illnesses. With out vultures to rapidly decide them clear, rotting flesh piles up. It may well unfold illness by means of shut contact or by stepping into water. And all that further meat meant extra energy for feral canines, which spiked in quantity. This is Chinmay Sonawane, a biologist at Stanford.

CHINMAY SONAWANE: Hundreds of thousands extra feral canines, tens of millions of extra folks being bitten by these canines, and it is estimated one thing like 50,000 further folks had been dying from rabies.

LAMBERT: To Sonawane, vultures exemplify the big however usually hidden advantages that scavengers present. And it is not simply vultures. Researchers have discovered that African hyenas decide clear cattle carcasses that may unfold anthrax, and catlike civets in Malaysia can reduce down on diarrhea-causing micro organism by scarfing up rancid meat.

SONAWANE: Within the final, like, 5 or so years, there had been a burst of case research this relationship between scavenging species and human well being.

LAMBERT: Sonawane and his colleagues analyzed all these case research and got here away with a worrying image. They discovered that 36% of scavenging species are declining or threatened with extinction. Bigger scavengers had been particularly threatened.

SONAWANE: After we lose these massive wildlife, smaller wildlife have a tendency to exchange them.

LAMBERT: The research, printed within the journal PNAS final month, discovered that whereas these smaller scavengers, like rats or canines, can decide up among the slack, they’re simply not pretty much as good at cleansing up a carcass.

SONAWANE: Due to this fact, there’s extra carcass waste, due to this fact extra pathogens within the atmosphere. After which, due to this fact, persons are extra more likely to decide up illness from these sources.

LAMBERT: Persons are additionally extra more likely to decide up illnesses from smaller scavengers themselves, which have a tendency to hold extra pathogens. Whereas there’s nonetheless rather a lot to study in regards to the hyperlinks between scavengers and particular illnesses, Maastricht College biologist Christopher O’Bryan says this research represents a superb begin.

CHRISTOPHER O’BRYAN: The take-home message is that we have to be all the time factoring in nature into the equation of human well being. And we will not ignore it.

LAMBERT: The Indian vultures provide a cautionary story. Even after proscribing the medicine that sparked their decline, the vultures nonetheless have not recovered. Jonathan Lambert, NPR Information.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.

Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might differ. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.